Ask
Reply
Solution
30-12-2013 08:42 PM
Who else thinks that Vodafone are ripping off their customers by charging £100 for a Sure Signal device in order to provide a service to a paying customer where Vodafone themselves have been unable to provide a good enough 3G signal?
My guess is these devices probably have a manufacturing cost of less than £25 so Vodafone are making money from selling them even though the device is filling a gap in their own coverage and is utilising their customers' broadband facilities.
This really doesn't sound like good customer service to me!
30-12-2013 08:53 PM
Hi there
Interesting that you have come up with a figure of £25 to manufacture the units - please could you explain how you have come to that figure?
PWIAC
30-12-2013 11:01 PM
31-12-2013 02:31 PM - edited 31-12-2013 02:31 PM
31-12-2013 04:34 AM
Actually even at the RRP of £100, Vodafone are selling the sure signals at a loss as it costs more to manufacture them - i'm sure someone from Vodafone will confirm this. However they would rather sell these at a loss than lose customers. Yes, in an ideal world everyone would get 100% 2G/3G coverage everywhere but that's simply not possible. As for bandwidth usage our unit uses no more than 50-100mb data a month, hardly something to cry over.
03-01-2014 01:00 PM
Appreciate they may cost a lot to produce, but customers, incuding myself are paying a lot of money for a service which isn't 100% by any means, so yes, I agree with the original posting on this thread!
Here is why.....................
We have actually got one in our house which I currently cannot add my new sim card to, because it is registered to someone who no longer lives at our house and who is refusing to co-operate with me, so it is useless. After speaking to Vodafone, it seems the only solution is to buy another one, yes, another £100
Fuming to say the least! :manfrustrated: